Make addl_lib_search_paths a HashSet (Closes #7718). #10089
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2013
Seems pretty straightforward, but please let me know if I'm doing something wrong or the test needs to be rewritten.
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
trim paths in `box_default` This might help with rust-lang#10089, though I have not tested that yet. In any event, it keeps the suggestion short and to the point. --- changelog: Trim paths in [`box_default`] suggestion
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
…1995 add a test against rust-lang#10089 This was just an oversight while doing the box default path trimming PR, so I'm adding it rather late than never. --- changelog: none
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Seems pretty straightforward, but please let me know if I'm doing something wrong or the test needs to be rewritten.